Quantum consciousness pdf download

The problems with this mainstream physical interpretation and model begin right here , because the 'Goldstones' photons, weakons, gravitons, gluons, higgs are said to be 'virtual' that is not having a real physical existence.

This is erroneous, just as the mainstream notion of consciousness and mind being nonphysical is also not supported by a higher dimensional cosmology and physics. For a mass of say 10 50 tons you will have an energy summation of so Joules. But if you now use the quantum energy, also well defined in Planck parameters, you calculate the quantum energy per space quantum, and you get far higher values for this energy.

Using the conventions Planck Length, Holographic bounds etc. Now the string physics tells you that the energy per string quantum is something like Joules per cubic meter as a physical manifesto of this quantum energy; whilst the energy of all matter in space is something like 10 Joules per cubic meter. So the 'discrepancy' between quantum energy and matter energy is in a factor of so 74 and 87 in the quantum-Planck limit. This number then becomes associated with the 'Dark Energy' and the 'Dark Matter' to explain the discrepancy.

The 'empty space' of the atom so is in fact 'spanned' by the 'virtual' energy which is dark and has a dark matter component which is defined in physical consciousness parameters based on the quantum energy parameters and especially the physical size of the electron. Those physical definitions for consciousness then carry enormous implications of course.

Collapsing a hydrogen atom that is forcing the electron to overcome its weakon force field of the beta decay results in a neutron star of 'degenerate electrons' and you then can observe the quantum physics in the astrophysics.

So your original question regarding the empty space resolves in the transformation of energy density in space. Then you should adapt the quantum theory to the holographic universe and the multidimensional membrane physics to resolve the wave-particle duality and the quantum entanglement on both the micro-cosmic and the macro- cosmic scales to find the universal unification.

Journal of Cosmology. Archived from the original on 16 June Retrieved 13 August Hameroff; R. Penrose From my one-bedroom apartment, I want a five-bedroom house; from owning one factory I hope to own ten factories; I dream of being promoted from the position of a clerk to that of a CEO; I want a happy and fulfilling family life, and to raise children who also have fulfilling lives. PATEL explores one of the three bodies in depth, the subtle body, and how it evolves.

Understanding that we have these three bodies — physical, subtle and causal — we can then ask, which of these bodies is evolving? It changes according to how we purify and simplify it, so that the joy of the soul shines and radiates from within, and through this process we find the evolution of consciousness.

PATEL introduces us to the journey we embark upon to expand consciousness and the role of Yogic Transmission in that journey. There is another process that aids our journey into higher and higher states of consciousness. Without it, we would not manouver the obstacles, like with any journey into unknown universes. That vital ingredient is Yogic Transmission, known in the yogic literature as pranahuti. More particularly, it is Yogic Transmission utilized by a teacher of caliber. PATEL explores with us in more detail how we become entangled in worldly issues, how that expresses in the spiritual anatomy of a human being, and what we can do to remove the impressions that form.

Without cleaning of the subtle body, there is no real evolution. What needs to be cleaned from the subtle body? If you can close your eyes for a moment and imagine the subtle body, the heart-mind field of a human being, as a vast field of subtle energy, of consciousness. In this article we understand the way they form, and how each impression is drawn by its vibration to a particular centre in the human system.

PATEL shares with us some more thoughts on the spectrum of consciousness. The idea of a spectrum of consciousness is not new. Yogis and mystics have written about it since time immemorial, and more recently also western psychoanalysts and psychologists like Carl Jung and Ken Wilbur.

What do we learn from this literature? Yoga is all about personal experience. So far we have looked at the three bodies of a human being — the physical, subtle and the causal bodies. Yoga developed as a practical method to help us refine all these three bodies, to achieve our purpose of human evolution. The experience of the finer states generated in yogic practice is for the benefit of all humanity. But this is not a comprehensive understanding of Yoga.

In the traditional yogic literature there are thirty-five different principles and methods that make up Yoga, and they form an integrated whole.

As he explains in the Appendix p. In his first chapter, Chalmers gives an excellent discussion of the distinction between the former, which he calls the phenomenal concept of mind, and the latter, which he calls the psychological concept of mind.

In his language, what I mean by a conscious experience and by other approximate synonyms that I might use, such as perception or sensation or awareness is the phenomenal concept, and not the psychological one. This measure in some sense gives the level or degree of reality that the conscious perception p has. Perceptions with large measures have high degrees of reality, whereas perceptions with very low measures have tiny degrees of reality and effectively can be ignored.

Rather, w p is to be interpreted as being proportional to the probability of getting this particular experience if a random selection were made. Because the specification of the conscious experience p completely determines its content and how it is experienced how it feels , the weight w p has absolutely no effect on that—there is absolutely no way within the experience to sense anything directly of what the weight is. A toothache within a particular conscious experience p is precisely as painful an experience no matter what w p is.

It is just that an experience with a greater w p has a greater degree of existence and is more likely in the sense of being more probably chosen by a random selection using the weights w p. One might note that in comparison with the more general assumptions of Page, , , here for simplicity I am making the more restrictive hypothesis that the set M of all conscious perceptions p is a countable discrete set.

The Psycho-Physical Parallelism Axiom is the simplest way I know to connect the quantum world with the conscious world. Instead, my Psycho-Physical Parallelism Axiom restricts the function to be linear in the expectation values. In short, I am proposing that the psycho- physical parallelism is linear. Of course, the Psycho-Physical Parallelism Axiom, like the Quantum World Ax- iom, is here also deliberately vague as to the form of the awareness operators A p , because I do not have a detailed theory of consciousness, but only a framework for fitting it with quantum theory.

My suggestion is that a theory of consciousness that is not inconsistent with bare quantum theory should be formulated within this framework. I feel that present detailed theories may be analogous to the cargo cults of the South Pacific after World War II, in which an incorrect theory was adopted, that aircraft with goods would land simply if airfields and towers were built.

Neither is there any free will in the incompatibilist sense, and consciousness may be viewed as an epiphe- nomenon Page, , Nevertheless, because the framework has normalized measures w p for conscious perceptions, these can be interpreted as probabilities for the perceptions, given the theory.

A major problem at the frontier of theoretical cosmology is essentially to develop one or more theories that give the measures w p for conscious perceptions, except that most theorists are hesitant to focus on conscious perceptions and hence ask for the probability of an observation Oj given a theory Ti , P Oj Ti. It is usually left rather vague what is supposed to constitute an observation. For me the most funda- mental entities that can be identified with observations are conscious perceptions, so I would take P Oj Ti to be wi pj , the normalized measure that theory Ti assigns to the conscious perception pj.

Here, for compactness, I do not explicitly display the dependence of the Aj operators on the theory Ti , but different theories can differ not only in their quantum states but also in their awareness operators. In this generalized view, Aj is simply the operator in the theory Ti whose expectation value in the quantum state given by that theory gives the probability of the observation Oj. Part 2 includes the boundary conditions that specify which solution of the dynamical laws describes our actual universe, but even Part 1 augmented with Part 2 is not sufficient.

Part 3 includes the rules for extracting the probabilities of observations from the quantum state. The logical independence of Part 3 is becoming widely recognized with the measure problem of cosmology Linde, ; Garcia-Bellido et al. However, theories of eternal inflation Linde, ; Garcia-Bellido et al.

Therefore, a lot of work has gone into different proposed schemes for regularizing the infinities. I have pointed out that even in finite universes, quantum uncertainties in the numbers of occurrences also leads to ambiguities in the probabilities of observations Page, , a,b,c, The ambiguity occurs even for finite universes, but it is particularly severe for infinite universes.

So whether or not the operators Aj whose expectation values give the the probabilities of observations are interpreted to be awareness operators in Sensible Quantum Mechanics or Mindless Sensationalism in which the observations are conscious perceptions , it is now recognized that there is the challenge of finding these operators, in addition to the challenge of finding the dynamics or algebra of all operators and the quantum state.

Of course, the framework would only become a complete theory once one had the set of all conscious experiences, the awareness operators, and the quantum state of the universe. Bibliography Aguirre, A. In: Carr, B. Bousso, R. Geometric origin of coincidences and hierarchies in the landscape.